- THIS IS ANT

Username		Password		Remember Me?	forgot password?

22 December 2016 02:47 PM

tsurf16 Newbie

Total Posts: 5

Joined 2013-11-22

I have several FIT files coming off of Garmin watches that are causing the following error. I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this and has a solution? It looks to be a problem inside of the library itself:

An item with the same key has already been added.
System.Web.HttpUnhandledException (0x80004005): Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. ---> System.ArgumentException: An item with the same key has already been added.
at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentException(ExceptionResource resource)
at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Insert(TKey key, TValue value, Boolean add)
at Dynastream.Fit.DeveloperDataLookup.Add(DeveloperDataIdMesg mesg)
at Dynastream.Fit.Decode.HandleMetaData(Mesg newMesg)
at Dynastream.Fit.Decode.RaiseMesgEvent(Mesg newMesg)
at Dynastream.Fit.Decode.DecodeNextMessage(Stream fitStream)
at Dynastream.Fit.Decode.Read(Stream fitStream, DecodeMode mode)
at Dynastream.Fit.Decode.Read(Stream fitStream)
at FitFileReader.ReadFile(Stream Data, TextWriter Output, Boolean WriteDebug) in d:\home\site\wwwroot\App_Code\DeviceWorkout\FitFile.cs:line 124

Thanks for any help you can provide. I have attached the FIT file that is causing this issue.

File Attachments

1492083506.fit (File Size: 62KB - Downloads: 863)

27 December 2016 04:36 AM #1

edge-python Jr. Member

Total Posts: 44

Joined 2013-04-07

PM

What I found:
- Decoding with java seems to work
- The fit file does not seem to be corrupt

It's probably a problem of your decoding program

The problem could be the order of the fields:

===================================================================================
Record 28  0x4e1
Header-Byte:  77  0x4d | header type: 0 = NORMAL
message_type: 1 = DEFINITION | local_message_no: 13  |
developer_flag: 0 = PROFIL |

Record 28 Content:
reserved: 0 | architecture: 0 LITTLE_ENDIAN | global_mesg: 206 FIELD_DESCRIPTION | fields: 10 |
   field  # :   # Definition                              Size Base-Type
   field  0 :   3 field_name                               64   7  string
   field  1 :   8 units                                    16   7  string
   field  2 :  13 fit_base_unit_id                          2   4  uint16
   field  3 :  14 native_mesg_num                           2   4  uint16
   field  4 :   0 developer_data_index                      1   2  uint8
   field  5 :   1 field_definition_number                   1   2  uint8
   field  6 :   2 fit_base_type_id                          1   2  uint8
   field  7 :   6 scale                                     1   2  uint8
   field  8 :   7 offset                                    1   1  sint8
   field  9 :  15 native_field_num                          1   2  uint8
=================================================================================== 

I need to customize my own program as well
So far I have expected as first fields:

field  0 :   0 developer_data_index                      1   2  uint8
field  1 :   1 field_definition_number                   1   2  uint8 

But the order may well be different …
(Mixing the fields is a philosophy of FIT SDK ;- )

In the “doughnuts“-example it was easier:

===================================================================================
Record 5  0x48
Header-Byte:  64  0x40 | header type: 0 = NORMAL
message_type: 1 = DEFINITION | local_message_no: 0  |
developer_flag: 0 = PROFIL |

Record 5 Content:
reserved: 0 | architecture: 1 BIG_ENDIAN | global_mesg: 206 FIELD_DESCRIPTION | fields: 5 |
   field  # :   # Definition                              Size Base-Type
   field  0 :   0 developer_data_index                      1   2  uint8
   field  1 :   1 field_definition_number                   1   2  uint8
   field  2 :   2 fit_base_type_id                          1   2  uint8
   field  3 :   3 field_name                               17   7  string
   field  4 :   8 units                                    10   7  string
===================================================================================
Record 6  0x5d
Header-Byte:  0  0x0 | header type: 0 = NORMAL
message_type: 0 = DATA | local_message_no: 0 FIELD_DESCRIPTION |
developer_flag: 0 = PROFIL |

Record 6 Content:
              developer_data_index                0                                     0
           field_definition_number                0                                     0
                  fit_base_type_id                1                                 sint8
                        field_name
                                                                   b'doughnuts_earned\x00'
                                                                         doughnuts_earned
                             units
                                                                          b'doughnuts\x00'
                                                                                doughnuts
===================================================================================
Record 7  0x7c
Header-Byte:  96  0x60 | header type: 0 = NORMAL
message_type: 1 = DEFINITION | local_message_no: 0  |
developer_flag: 1 = DEVELOPER |

Record 7 Content:
reserved: 0 | architecture: 1 BIG_ENDIAN | global_mesg: 20 RECORD | fields: 4 |
   field  # :   # Definition                              Size Base-Type
   field  0 :   3 heart_rate                                1   2  uint8
   field  1 :   4 cadence                                   1   2  uint8
   field  2 :   5 distance                                  4   6  uint32
   field  3 :   6 speed                                     2   4  uint16
dev_fields: 1 |
   field  # : idx num Definition                          Size Base-Type
   field  0 :   0   0 doughnuts_earned                      1   1  sint8
=================================================================================== 

edge-python

File Attachments

1492083506_decoded.zip (File Size: 104KB - Downloads: 715)

27 December 2016 09:51 AM #2

edge-python Jr. Member

Total Posts: 44

Joined 2013-04-07

PM

I have now found something
It was not the order of the fields

It is by the way of using these fields

field  7 :   6 scale                                     1   2  uint8
field  8 :   7 offset                                    1   1  sint8 

I mean if they were not needed they should be omitted

If they are not omitted,

then the values should not be set to invalid,

scale              255                       (invalid value)
offset             127                       (invalid value) 

values should be set to scale = 1 and offset = 0

scale                1                                     1
offset               0                                     0 

The attachment contains a fix and a pdf

What is the opinion of the moderators on this problem?

edge-python

File Attachments

1492083506_fix.zip (File Size: 141KB - Downloads: 734)

28 December 2016 11:53 AM #3

tsurf16 Newbie

Total Posts: 5

Joined 2013-11-22

PM

edge-python -

Thanks for all of your work. The issue we're having is we use the SDK's library for parsing within our C# application. This error is being thrown when we call it's "read" function. We're looking at a way to try and get around the parsing of developer data but at this point I don't think we can. We are at the mercy of that SDK for the time being it seems.

Hopefully a moderator see this and pushes it up the chain to see if the library itself can implement your fix.

ANT Forum

FIT File parse crash on duplicate DeveloperData

File Attachments

File Attachments

File Attachments